𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚢-𝙼𝚊𝚕𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝

clearancecreedwatersurvival

cannabiscomrade

I wasn't going to derail the disability pride month post for people with peanut allergies but in relation to that topic

I have never seen another allergy that has been so viscerally hated and mocked by people working in education like nut allergies. I've seen fellow teachers cringe that their classroom was the "nut free" classroom that year. Support staff that are trained and willfully don't follow cross contamination protocol in the lunchroom because it's too "tedious" or "time-consuming". Full preschools + childcare centers that refuse to accommodate nut allergies. Schools where the only free lunch is a PB&J. Before/after school programs and summer programs whose food curriculum has nuts and doesn't provide an alternative activity.

Allergy discrimination is so so insidious and prevalent. It's happening behind their back and it is everything from the exposure joke to possibly causing someone to go into anaphylaxis from willful ignorance.

Also other parents in the classroom are guilty too. The "not my child not my problem" brain rot means that those lunchboxes are like bombs for airborne exposure allergies

count-woe-laf

exitwound

i was born inside an airpod case 3 minutes ago your honor and i love abortion

no-need-to-apply

this is the most unhelpful post ever

exitwound

do i look like a fucking faq to you

exitwound

#f slur

is it a slur to ask questions frequently

sparrowofsong

baradragontaur

the most annoying people are the ones who just reply "no 💖" to recovery/self-improvement posts

baradragontaur

THE WET BOX

baradragontaur

ill never forgive you guys for reblogging the version without the wet box addition now there's edgelords in my notes and nobody gets to hear about the wet box

tropicalfreckles

orcapologist

It's Wet Beast Wednesday

baristhyena-deactivated20230510

cmon kid... we've gotta go save Wet Beast Wednesday.... TWO!

funky-writer-man

ice-block

Phenomenon I feel happens a lot

aro-ace-thetic

[ID: a doodle of two people looking away from each other. The first person is thinking, "If they wanted me to know they would tell me. I shouldn't ask about it." The second person is thinking, "If they cared about it they would ask me. I shouldn't talk About it." End ID.]

dollefied

sweet boy. baby. tiny boy. precious.

poisonedapples

teaboot

Please don't ask me for relationship advice unless you are prepared to receive some truly upsetting information because some people are ready for the "He's exhibiting the literal textbook signs of a psychological abuser and you need to get away from him before he successfully cuts you off from your support network" talk and some people aren't

teaboot

FOR WHOEVER NEEDS A REMINDER:

There is never any justification for someone putting their hands on you in any way without your consent short of immediate risk of harm or death.
If someone tells you that "the way I'm acting is your fault because you know that doing X thing would make me do it and you chose to do it anyway" is just fancy bullshit talk for, "I know my behaviour is wrong, but I don't want to be held responsible for it so I'm pushing it on you"
Nothing good ever, ever comes from someone who tells you, "I don't want you talking about our relationship with anyone". This person cannot handle accepting responsibility and processing criticism so they need you to never, ever question them. That's easier if they control the narrative and your friends aren't there to cut in.
Nothing constructive comes from screaming.
"It's not like that all the time" is optimistic and sweet, but the truth is, it shouldn't be like that at all. Sweet words and gifts and gestures don't erase being frightened for yourself or for your loved ones. That is not normal. Don't minimize it.
It is not healthy or normal to be genuinely afraid of saying "no" to someone, for any reason at all. Violence, outbursts, retaliation, anything. You should not have to be afraid of someone's reaction to your boundaries.
You are not responsible for saving anyone. Even if you love them. Even if they have nobody else. At the end of the day, if they want to hurt themselves in any way, they will, and you can't stop them forever. People need to want to improve before they can actually improve, and if they're threatening to harm themselves to keep you around, they're using your love to hold themselves hostage. You do not decide their choices for them, and they don't get to shunt that off on you.
There will always be other people who can love you better. You will not be alone forever. This will not be the last time you care for someone like this and it will not be the last time someone cares for you

teaboot

This applies to ALL relationships btw

decidedlyoverwhelmed

psychotic-gerard

you will never be antiableism/saneism if you still expect people to conform to societal understandings of ‘what is acceptable behaviour for a person to partake and look like’. this includes people with motor movements that are jerky, stumbling, or erratic. this includes people who’s speech is slurred, stuttered, is filled with grammatical errors, or otherwise difficult to underhand. this includes adults who wear diapers. this includes people who talk to themselves. this includes people who have poor volume control. people who have a poor sense of space. people who make sounds suddenly. people of any age who cannot do ‘normal’ things, like cut their own nails, use a remote, tie shoelaces or similar things. people who cannot ever live on their own and will always need a carer. people who cannot wash themselves. people who forget things all the fucking time. so much more i’ve forgotten. as long as you go out in public and believe behaviour that doesn’t harm you as being behaviour that should not exist in public, you aren’t as anti-ableist/saneist as you believe. you’re not the centre of the world, sorry.

𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚢-𝙼𝚊𝚕𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

THE WET BOX

Do not spread the pro-life version. Conservatives specifically try to push their ways to sign things as the default. You are unintentionally helping overpower deaf women’s rights advocates.